|
|
-
-
|
Why do You question whether this rose is correct Yourselves?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 4 posted
20 MAY 17 by
 jedmar
|
Jay-Jay, as I can see, this rose should be blush to white, not pink as in marcir's and your photos.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 4 posted
20 MAY 17 by
Jay-Jay
|
Would my photo of today be white with blush-pink?
PS: Aaah, I see, that the rose that Cliff pictured is completely different in color and in shape.
PPS: Mine origins from Loubert. On their photo this rose is a lot paler: http://www.pepiniere-rosesloubert.com/catalogue,3/caecilie-scharsach,990251.html
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 4 posted
21 MAY 17 by
jedmar
|
Yes, see also the photos on Karin's Website:
http://www.stauden-und-rosen.de/index.php?seite=rosen&id=27
Same questions also regarding 'Anna Scharsach'. I will ask Erich's opinion.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 4 posted
21 MAY 17 by
Jay-Jay
|
Thank You.
But this Cäcilie looks and smells as if Geschwind could have created it.
|
REPLY
|
|
