|
'Star of the Republic' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
I am very confused about the parentage of this one. In the comment just below, AndrewBarocco cites the breeder's notes, which state wichuraiana is the pollen parent, not abyssinica. Is there a conflicting source, or another reason why the parentage has not been updated?
|
REPLY
|
I have been wondering the same. Anybody know whence the original claim of parentage arose?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 10 posted
15 AUG 23 by
jedmar
Citing of unpublished notes isn't sufficient for modifying the parentage. We would need at least some photos of the relevant notes.
|
REPLY
|
I agree with you, of course, it would be better if Andrew Barocco could share this if he has access to it.. By that standard, I have the same question as Philip ATX above: what is the source for the parentage being Abyssinica? Is it in the registration?
|
REPLY
|
Can you please clarify as to what source could be cited providing the claim to Abyssinica in the parentage? It seems highly improbable IMHO.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 10 posted
28 SEP 23 by
Lee H.
My MR12 shows GT x R. Wichuriana.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#6 of 10 posted
29 SEP 23 by
jedmar
Parentage was certainly from the registration. This listing was added in April 2006. We have now revised the pollen parent to Rosa wichurana as per MR12
|
REPLY
|
Thank you for that.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#8 of 10 posted
1 OCT 23 by
Lee H.
I guess this is as good a time as any to bring this up, but does anybody know if there is a preferred or proper spelling for Wichuxxxxx? I see HMF uses Wichurana and Wichuraiana, while the ARS apparently cleaves to Wichuriana.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#9 of 10 posted
1 OCT 23 by
jedmar
The name of the class is based on the German botanist Max Ernst Wichura. (Wichura = Storm, Gale in Polish). It was originally spelled Wichuraiana by Crépin in 1887. This was corrected to the correct Latin form Wichurana around the 1920s. Wichuriana is any case incorrect.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#10 of 10 posted
2 OCT 23 by
Lee H.
|