One or more site guests believe this photo is incorrectly labeled or inaccurate !
-
-
|
Possibly the light pink 1941 'Mrs. John McNab', rather than the deep pink 1932 'John McNab'.
|
REPLY
|
|
You know, I have wondered about that myself. It was bought as John mcNab though. Thanks for the information. It is not a very good flowerer in my garden, possibly because it gets a bit too much shade from a birch tree which is about to loose one of its two trunks this autumn and a few of its lower branches too.
Best regards Arvid.
|
REPLY
|
|
If you are happy about it being 'Mrs. John McNab' you (or we) could always reassign your photos to the correct rose page.
Shade - from trees. Know exactly what you are talking about. Just yesterday I cut out the lower branches of a Ulmus, Chinese elm. Dreadful business, tree branches and rose canes. A bit of gentle swearing helps.
|
REPLY
|
|
Yes, I am not quite sure how to do it though, but if you want to, fine. About cutting back the birch tree, I have made an agreement with my neighbour`s son, so I hope to leave the swearing to him.
Best regards Arvid.
|
REPLY
|
|
Photos reassigned to 'Mrs. John McNab'. Thanks Arvid.
|
REPLY
|
|
And thank YOU, Patricia.
|
REPLY
|
