One or more site guests believe this photo is incorrectly labeled or inaccurate !
-
-
Initial post
1 MAY 20 by
jedmar
|
I believe 'Reynolds Hole' from Paul is extinct. It was a rose with sometimes good blooms, but very susceptible to dieseases. In any case the rose on your photo is pink, not dark scarlet-red as 'Reynolds Hole' should be (see engraving). I have seen the discussion you had last June/July - don't think it is the correct rose to post here.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
1 MAY 20 by
HubertG
|
Could this be the true 'Mrs. Reynolds Hole' (assuming that the rose in commerce under that name might not be correct)? What known association does the rose pictured have with the Reynolds Hole name?
Early descriptions of 'Mrs. Reynolds Hole' of the flowers being produced singly on long stems seems to fit this rose more so the than the rose in commerce as MrsRH.
EDIT: Never mind - I just found and read Mr Campos' original discussion and see it was just a guess at a found rose with no provenance.
|
REPLY
|
