|
|
scvirginia 
-
-
Initial post
29 FEB by
sam w
|
Zones 3a to 3b seems a bit odd!
|
REPLY
|
|
It certainly does! It's a sport of 'Heinrich Schultheis', so I've changed the zone ranges to reflect that rose's.
Thanks for letting us know,
Virginia
|
REPLY
|
-
-
-
-
|
This is beautiful, but it doesn't look like other photos of 'Animating'. Could it be 'Hermosa', and the signage at the garden went awry?
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
I see that we don't have any parentage listed for this rose. Is this just an oversight, or do we have reason to doubt the R. pendulina x R. chinensis formula?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
29 DEC by
jedmar
|
Yes, there were doubts: According to Thory in 1824, the double Boursault rose is a seedling of the single Rosa reclinata, which in turn was a cross of R. chinensis x R. alpina. This parentage added. Later parentage statements came 70 years later and seem to be a simplification.
|
REPLY
|
|
