'Baby Château' rose Reviews & Comments 
 
 
  
  
  most recent 14 JUL   
Initial post 
28 FEB 20  by
flodur 
 
  
   The reference "Rosenjahrbuch, Book  (2017)  Page(s) 25". is not correct. Baby Château is not mentioned in that book!
   
   
  
   REPLY 
   
  
 
Reply 
#1  posted 
28 FEB 20  by
jedmar 
 
  
   Wrong year, the reference is taken from a Google snippet which states 1968, but could well be an adjacent year.
   
   
  
   REPLY 
   
  
 
Reply 
#2  posted 
28 FEB 20  by
flodur 
 
  
   Danke, habe ich gefunden. Victor Teschendorff, Dresden, nennt in seinem Rosenkatalog von 1936, Aroma x Hamburg als Eltern.
   
   
  
   REPLY 
   
  
 
 
  
   I just came across the entry for 'Baby Chateau' in the Kordes 1936 catalogue when it was introduced and they themselves give the parentage as 'Aroma' x 'Hamburg'.
   
   
  
   REPLY 
   
  
 
  
  
  
  most recent 31 JUL 09   
Initial post 
30 JUL 09  by
Don H 
 
  
   From this discussion at the Heritage Rose Foundation forum, it seems like Baby Chateau is no longer extant at the Cranford.
   
   
  
   REPLY 
   
  
 
 
  
   I inquired about this a few years ago. Yes, it's a real shame.
   
   
  
   REPLY