In Google Patents, it is listed as Freedom (Dickson) x Goldmarie 82, but they describe the correct plant.

In the late 90s/early 2000s, Poulsen had several patent errors. It happens because plant patent specialists at the USPTO are very rare, and roses are fairly much alien to them. The last time I spoke with them, some 4 years ago, there were only 2 plant patent specialists, with a small handful working under them.

This rose is clearly the other parents listed, and clearly not from either parent in the Google Patent.

This means that parentage likely belongs to another Poulsen rose from that era, and this was a Poulsen clerical error. Yet, no Poulsen rose is listed as breed from Freedom, but whatever it is... is likely yellow, yellow blend, apricot, or orange blend.

patents.google.com/patent/USPP13835P3/en?q=(poulrohill)&oq=poulrohill