HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
DescriptionPhotosLineageAwardsReferencesMember RatingsMember CommentsMember JournalsCuttingsGardensBuy From 
'Jadis' rose Reviews & Comments
HelpMeFind's future is in your hands - Please do not take this unique resource for granted.

Your support of HelpMeFind is urgently needed. HelpMeFind, like all websites, needs funding to survive. We have set a premium-membership yearly subscription amount as low as possible to make user-community funding viable.

We are grateful to the many members who have signed up so far, but the number of premium-membership members remains too small for us to sustain the current support and development level. If you value HelpMeFind and want to see it continue we need your support too.

Yearly membership is only $2.00 per month and adds a host of additional features, and numerous planned enhancements, to take full advantage of the power and convenience of HelpMeFind. Click here to start your premium membership..

We of course also welcome donations of any amount. Click here to make a donation. Donations of $24 or more receive a thank-you gift of a 1-year premium membership.

As far as we have come, we feel HelpMeFind is still in its infancy. With your support we have so much more to accomplish.
Discussion id : 98-657
most recent 14 MAR SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 21 APR 17 by drogers
The registration name is shown as Jadis in Modern Roses 12.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 3 posted 22 APR 17 by jedmar
That is an error. Jackson & Perlins' Registration names have to start with JAC... We have 'Jadis' as a synonym.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 3 posted 14 MAR by PatProfessor
No error. MR12 is correct. The rose was introduced by J&P about 1974, as 'Jadis'. You can find it in MR8. Code names were not used at the time so no code name was assigned. Later J&P reintroduced the rose as 'Fragrant Memory'. In an attempt to create a propriety position in a rose that was in the public domain, they trademarked the name 'Fragrant Memory' on March 14, 1995. This also required a generic name (I.e. code name) so the code name was assigned then. Apparently the effort was not successful because the trademark was abandoned and cancelled by the USPTO on Dec. 17, 2005.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 3 posted 14 MAR by jedmar
Thank you for the clarification!
REPLY
Discussion id : 128-774
most recent 11 AUG 21 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 11 AUG 21 by ksinGA
This rose has really been a surprise. The blooms are beautiful and very fragrant. Bush is very healthy in Atlanta. Highly recommend this one!
REPLY
Discussion id : 120-269
most recent 18 FEB 20 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 18 FEB 20 by Unregistered Guest
Available from - Rogue Valley Roses
roguevalleyroses.com
REPLY
Discussion id : 99-076
most recent 7 MAY 17 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 7 MAY 17 by Lavenderlace
Very nice vigorous rose here in Z8 with nice fragrance.
REPLY
© 2025 HelpMeFind.com