'Uncle Walter' rose reviews and comments

	Description		Photos		Lineage		Awards		References		Member Ratings		Member Comments		Member Journals		Cuttings		Gardens		Buy From

'Uncle Walter' rose Reviews & Comments

My HMF:

Discussion id : 73-114 most recent 28 JUL 13 SHOW ALL

Initial post 18 JUL 13 by Michał Babilas

Reply #1 of 1 posted 28 JUL 13 by HMF supporting member

Thank you!	REPLY

Discussion id : 63-843 most recent 27 APR 12 HIDE POSTS

Initial post 25 APR 12 by Simon Voorwinde

Parentage listing says: "Parentage: Detroiter × Heidelberg (hybrid kordesii, Kordes, 1959) " Is this right? I can't see Kordesii anywhere in the pedigree.	REPLY

Reply #1 of 4 posted 25 APR 12 by HMF supporting member

Simon... Check the information under the REFERENCES tab on the rose page. Several sources list the parentage we have used on HMF. Smiles, Lyn	REPLY

Reply #2 of 4 posted 26 APR 12 by Simon Voorwinde

I did... I'm not questioning the parentage. I'm questioning the referece to Kordesii. 'Heidelberg' doesn't go back to Kordesii that I can see... the references don't say it does. I think there has been a typo made and the 'hybrid kordesii" was added by mistake. I'm thinking it should just read (Kordes, 1959).	REPLY

Reply #3 of 4 posted 26 APR 12 by HMF supporting member

You are correct. Modern Roses and some other publications classify 'Heidelberg' as a hybrid kordesii; however, we have a 1983 reference stating that this is an error. We have therefore changed the class designation in the name to "Floribunda clg."	REPLY

Reply #4 of 4 posted 27 APR 12 by HMF supporting member

Thanks, Jedmar. Smiles, Lyn	REPLY