HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
DescriptionPhotosLineageAwardsReferencesMember RatingsMember CommentsMember JournalsGardensBuy From 
'Velvet Orange' rose Reviews & Comments
Discussion id : 105-461
most recent 6 NOV 22 SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 10 SEP 17 by Kathy Strong
I think Velvet Orange is registered as a floribunda, isn't it?
 REPLY
Reply #1 of 7 posted 10 SEP 17 by Patricia Routley
'Orange Velvet' 2011 is registered as a floribunda.
This 'Velvet Orange' 2010 is patented as a hybrid tea.
Same breeder.
 REPLY
Reply #2 of 7 posted 10 SEP 17 by Kathy Strong
I'll betcha they are the same rose -- just careless bookkeeping got the order of the words wrong on the other one.
 REPLY
Reply #3 of 7 posted 10 SEP 17 by Patricia Routley
Certainly on the cards. But only the breeder can tell us that. Mr. Coiner.....?
 REPLY
Reply #4 of 7 posted 5 NOV 22 by jmile
They are the same rose. I will post pictures of mine. They should be under the same name on HMF ---- especially since Kathy Strong and I are the only ones listing it here.
 REPLY
Reply #5 of 7 posted 5 NOV 22 by jedmar
'Velvet Orange' is patented as a Hybrid Tea by Coiner (2010). 'Orange Velvet' is a climber by Williams (1986)
 REPLY
Reply #6 of 7 posted 5 NOV 22 by jmile
I bought my COINER Orange Velvet at OSH along with the other COINER roses that they were selling. I took the info on my marker from the tag. If you look at HMF it lists both roses under Orange Velvet. Check the picture that I just put out here on HMF. Orange Velvet and Velvet Orange are the same COINER rose. They should be listed as AKA's.
 REPLY
Reply #7 of 7 posted 6 NOV 22 by jedmar
We have merged the two Coiner listings. The Registration listing of 'Orange Velvet' seems to have multiple differences to the Patent: Floribunda instead of Hybrid Tea, semi-double instead of full (25-33 petals), no fragrance instead of mild, glossy foliage instead of matte. Can you check your plant for these characters?
 REPLY
© 2024 HelpMeFind.com