HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
DescriptionPhotosLineageAwardsReferencesMember RatingsMember CommentsMember JournalsGardensBuy From 
'Noa16079' rose Reviews & Comments
Discussion id : 133-380
most recent 13 JUL SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 19 JUN 22 by Patricia Routley
I believe NOA16079 should be merged with NOA16071 Showpiece Lipstick.
The New Zealand Plant Variety Rights grant number 34868 says a commercial synonym for NOA16079 is Showpiece Lipstick.
Double checking before a merge.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 7 posted 19 JUN 22 by jedmar
Noa16071 and Noa16079 are distinct varietal names, and should not be merged. The only reason can be that Noack introduced a different rose as 'Showpiece Lipstick' in NZ, or that the synonym 'Showpiece Lipstick' is incorrect for Noa16071. The latter needs checking.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 7 posted 19 JUN 22 by Patricia Routley
Perhaps member Plazbo can help further, see his comment in 'NOA1112130‘
REPLY
Reply #3 of 7 posted 19 JUN 22 by Plazbo
Australia PBR has NOA16079 as Showpiece Lipstick

pericles.ipaustralia.gov.au/pbr_db/plant_detail.cfm?AID=39362379

noack has Noa16071 as Charisma
noack-rosen.de/produkt/charisma/

if we go to the tesselaar marketing photos for the showpiece line

www.flickr.com/photos/tesselaar/albums/72157718483636093

specifically
www.flickr.com/photos/tesselaar/50993818772/in/album-72157718483636093/

and do a reverse image search

tinyurl.com/yckbnjre

we find that same image being used in europe for Crazy Pink Voluptia eg
www.roseraiebarth.com/fr/rosiers-a-grandes-fleurs/rosier-crazy-pink-voluptia-noa16071.html

different picture showpiece lipstick picture (from the tessellar link above) on the german adr website
www.adr-rose.de/adr-rosen/rose/charismar/


So either someone sent out Noa16071 photos for NOA16079 or NOA16079 is a typo or something. For whatever reason, the marketing photos are the same for both if they aren't the same rose.
REPLY
Reply #4 of 7 posted 19 JUN 22 by Plazbo
Having said that (and because I don't want to edit the previous comment and get escaped html characters, so new comment)


The photo in the Australian PBR for NOA16079 (despite being listed as showpiece lipstick) doesn't look like the pictures on the tessellar site (or what people have posted as showpiece lipstick in australia rose facebook groups)...which is weird in itself. Maybe, Flower Carpet Pty Ltd (as the agent) did a goof and no ones noticed? The pbr photo looks more like showpiece blush, looking at the usa patent picture for showpiece blush show the darker petal base that's obvious on the australia pbr photo

www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=21.319066

the photo for blush on the australia pbr doesn't look like blush (pigment is too deep)....
pericles.ipaustralia.gov.au/pbr_db/plant_detail.cfm?AID=39362376

something goofy going on
REPLY
Reply #5 of 7 posted 19 JUN 22 by jedmar
What is clear is that if there are two different varietal names, these are distinct roses: So Noa16071 is not Noa16079, even though they may be similar or sister seedlings (very close numbers).
Noa16071 is clearly Charisma, syn. Crazy Pink Voluptia.
According to the Australian PBR Noa16079 is Showpiece Lipstick.
Photo confusion on nursery websites are not proof enough.
REPLY
Reply #6 of 7 posted 19 JUN 22 by Plazbo
Even in the USA patent for NOA16079 uses the same images as is used for Charisma (NOA16071)....interesting paperwork either way since either the USA patent is using images for the wrong rose or the pictures used for Charisma (for german adr and such) aren't pictures of Charisma.
REPLY
Reply #7 of 7 posted 13 JUL by Michael Garhart
Honestly wouldn't be the first time. Poulsen made some booboos in the 1990s.

They clear because there are so few patent examiners for plants, and roses are considered niche.
REPLY
Discussion id : 167-846
most recent 13 JUL HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 13 JUL by Michael Garhart
I've been growing this for for 6 months from an already growing plant.

So far, I would consider this a larger flowered floribunda. However, it is quite healthy. All foliage is intact. It is probably a decent "HT-like" rose for huge pots, which might be a draw for some.
REPLY
Discussion id : 159-801
most recent 2 JAN HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 1 JAN by Bug_girl
Being released by Monrovia (USA) 2024 as Eau de Parfum Bling PPAF.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 1 posted 2 JAN by jedmar
Thank you, synonyms added!
REPLY
© 2024 HelpMeFind.com