|
-
-
This illustration seems out of step with other early ones - no prickles, and a different-shaped receptacle.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
15 JUL 22 by
CybeRose
Artistic license? Compared to the picture in Journal des Roses (June 1880), the sepals are also wrong.
|
REPLY
|
Or a very early mix-up in labelling?
|
REPLY
|
|