|
|
Phylogenetic Relationship in the Genus Rosa Based on the Restriction Enzyme Analysis of the Chloroplast DNA
(2000) Page(s) 602.
R. gigantea, R. moschata, and R. damascena were grouped into a cluster apart from the section Gallicanae because they appear to be monophyletic, whereas R. damascena was classified into the Section Gallicanae (Rehder, 1940). These species are more alike from morphological classification than from a molecular one , making them difficult to categorize.
(2000) Page(s) 602.
R. gigantea, R. moschata, and R. damascena were grouped into a cluster apart from the section Gallicanae because they appear to be monophyletic, whereas R. damascena was classified into the Section Gallicanae (Rehder, 1940). These species are more alike from morphological classification than from a molecular one , making them difficult to categorize.
(2000) Page(s) 603.
R. roxburghiin hirtula is recognized by some authors as species R. hirtula, whereas others identify it as a variety of R. roxburghiin. In this study, we detected polymorphisms not only on recognition sites of restriction enzymes but also on the length of amplified DNA by PCR (data not shown) between R. roxburghiin and R. roxburghiin hirtula. We propose that the two species be separated, based on the difference in their cpDNA.
(2000) Page(s) 602.
R. gigantea, R. moschata, and R. damascena were grouped into a cluster apart from the section Gallicanae because they appear to be monophyletic, whereas R. damascena was classified into the Section Gallicanae (Rehder, 1940). These species are more alike from morphological classification than from a molecular one , making them difficult to categorize.
|
