|
|
Michael Garhart 
-
-
|
Australia’s rose of the year, not Auckland rose of the year
|
REPLY
|
|
That is probably why the codename doesn't seem to imply what its bred from, but rather the awards it gathered.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 2 posted
today by
Johno
|
No, just a simple typo.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Needs to land into the Oso Easy series.
|
REPLY
|
|
Bit of a novelty, but I don't think so. I hope you enjoy yours, if you grow ot.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
The fact that this rose disappeared from mass commerce is a crime of fashion.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
I personally don’t agree that this could be classified as HT.
|
REPLY
|
|
I have a seedling that looks like the photos, but in coral red. Same mounding habit. Same big fluffy blooms in randomized clusters. Same big foliage.
I listed it as flori in my breeder book. Just because some parts are bigger, does not mean the entirety is still not a duck -- in my opinion. That rose quacks lol.
|
REPLY
|
|
