|
-
-
Initial post
25 FEB 05 by
Henry
Although listed here as R. foliosa, it should be R. foliolosa (note the extra "lo").
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 5 posted
2 MAY 10 by
Unregistered Guest
My sources are telling me that R. Foliosa IS A SEPARATE species to R.Foliolosa, and the two should not be confused.
|
REPLY
|
Can you provide more details.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 5 posted
3 MAY 10 by
Unregistered Guest
Refer to this discussion today from the Rose Hybridizisers Association forum on how R.foliolosa should not be confused with R.foliosa:
http://www.rosehybridizers.org/forum/message.php?topid=24614#27566
|
REPLY
|
I believe since RHA upgraded and that url changed, this is the current format of that thread:
www.rosebreeders.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=24614&p=27566&hilit=foliosa#p27566
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 5 posted
6 MAY 10 by
Cass
Thanks. You're right. All the images posted here should be posted to Rosa foliolosa. This name is probably a synonym of a well-known European species.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
25 FEB 04 by
Henry
Bibi Maizoon is one of my favorite roses. The large, cabbage shapped buds open to full, old-fashioned blooms. The fragrance is quite strong and pleasant.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
25 FEB 04 by
Anonymous-1223
According to Kordes' 2003/2004 catalogue, the name for this rose is Linderhof (not Linderof or Lindherof), which also matches the name of one of King Ludwig II's castles in Bavaria.
|
REPLY
|
|