|
|
AmiRoses 
-
-
|
rosa serratipetala is not available au Pépiènières Loubert
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
23 NOV 20 by
AmiRoses
|
it is under Fimbriata name.
|
REPLY
|
|
Bonjour,
La 'Fimbriata' chez Loubert est presque entièrement blanche, ce n'est donc pas la 'Serratipatala' de Prévost qui est "rose foncé vif". Cette dernière parait bien plus proche de celle attribuée à Jacques (1827) qui est un chinensis presque sans aiguillons, ce qui n'est pas du tout le cas de la rose de Prévost.
Je pense que la rose de Prévost n'existe plus hélas !
Cordialement,
Daniel
NB 'Serratipetala' de Prévost (avec un accent) n'est pas de 1818 mais de 1828
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
24 NOV 20 by
jedmar
|
Agree. Loubert's 'Serratipetala' is the same which is in commerce also as 'Oeillet de Saint-Arquey' or 'Fimbriata', and not Prévosts's 'Serratipetala'. We have moved the nursery listings to "Serratipetala (in commerce)"
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
29 JAN 20 by
jedmar
|
Mislabeled at L'Haÿ. Should be violet-red
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
30 JAN 20 by
AmiRoses
|
Yes, That is Château de la Juvénie
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Thanks for putting this up Etienne!
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 4 posted
4 DEC 19 by
AmiRoses
|
You're welcome John, I hope to get one someday!
|
REPLY
|
|
I've got a start saved for you
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 4 posted
3 JAN 20 by
AmiRoses
|
Wow, thank you John !
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 4 posted
3 JAN 20 by
Jay-Jay
|
Wonderful rose, John!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Is this the prickly one which I saw at l'hay in 2010?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
11 JUN 19 by
AmiRoses
|
Yes and I was wondering if that could be Mme Eugène Verdier as it was at l'Haÿ too.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 2 posted
11 JUN 19 by
kai-eric
|
Seems that loubert got their budwood from l'hay as they are selling a prickly madame bérard that ressembles a lot to your pictures.
|
REPLY
|
|
