|
|
-
-
Initial post
4 JAN 20 by
orsola
|
This is not 'Madame de Verneville'. Rather 'Top Brass'.
|
REPLY
|
|
Could you elaborate a little more please Orsola. Theo’s photo looks pretty much the same as your photos of ‘Madame de Verneville’
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 4 posted
6 JAN 20 by
orsola
|
It's simple: 'Madame de Verneville' has no cream flakes, nor any more pink on top. This is how it looks in the German peony encyclopedia, as in my photos, which are not similar to Theo’s photo.
http://www.paeo.de/aaa/01320.html
|
REPLY
|
|
Oh dear....i was comparing a Peony photo with a rose photo. My apologies and thsnk you.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 4 posted
7 JAN 20 by
orsola
|
I don't have a rose with that name so I can't comment on that.
Regards
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
This seems almost a gallica. Prickles and sepals do not seem to be those of “Benny Lopez”.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
14 NOV 18 by
orsola
|
Thank you for your attention.
Please send this correction to the owners of Mottisfont Abbey Garden. Hampshire, UK
|
REPLY
|
|
Orsola, the caption for your photo says Poland, May 2016.
What have Mottisfont got to do with it?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
15 NOV 18 by
orsola
|
Yes, I was wrong. Which does not change the fact that the picture was taken not in my garden and I did not sign a rose. Congratulations on the ability to recognize varieties by the appearance of buds.
The photo was taken at the rose nursery in Poland.
Greetings
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Wow, that is incredibly gorgeous.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
8 AUG 18 by
orsola
|
Thank you very much Innessa.
Such beautiful flowers have when it blooms a second time.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
27 MAY 18 by
orsola
|
The picture does not show 'Monsieur Jules Elie'
|
REPLY
|
|
