|
|
'DICam' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
21 JAN 18 by
 Ray and Pauline Martin
|
Hi
We have had it pointed out to us by Colin Dickson that you have given the breeder of Red Devil as Alexander Dickson. He said;
"I think the breeding of Red Devil should be credited to Patrick Dickson [Colin's father] and not his father [Colin's grandfather]."
Hope this helps
Ray Martin
The Rose Society UK
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
22 JAN 18 by
Patricia Routley
|
Thank you Ray. We've made the correction.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
11 DEC 11 by
Cà Berta
|
For most of the references Silver Lining and Prima Ballerina are the parents..... besides, it is in a 1969 catalogue so it was already bred in that year.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 5 posted
12 DEC 11 by
RoseBlush
|
Yes... see the NOTE at the foot of the rose page. The article "Red Hybrid Teas" was written by Patrick Dickson stating a different cross. Since the rose was hybridized by Alexander Dickson, the linage reported in the article was probably from in-house records.
Smiles,
Lyn
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 5 posted
17 OCT 13 by
Patricia Routley
|
I wonder if the parentage of ‘Red Devil’ should be
‘Silver Lining’ x [Red Burn x Prima Ballerina]
See 1975 and 1980 references.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 5 posted
19 OCT 13 by
jedmar
|
The US Patent states "Seedling of Silver Lining Prima Ballerina", which is a bit ambigous: could be "a seedling of Silver Ligning x Prima Ballerina" or a seedling of "Silver Lining x Prima Ballerina".
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 5 posted
20 OCT 13 by
Cà Berta
|
...but it specifies also that "The present invention relates to a new and distinct variety of rose plant of the hybrid tea class, which was originated by me by crossing the rose variety known as Silver Lining (unpatented) with the rose variety known as Prima Ballerina (unpatented).
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 5 posted
21 OCT 13 by
HMF Admin
|
We've updated the listing.
|
REPLY
|
|
