|
|
Recent Questions, Answers and Comments
-
-
Initial post
9 days ago by
 Louis Galarneau
|
I had two beautiful one and lost the two of them this year from dye back ! " Did this happen to someone else with that rose ?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
today by
Louis Galarneau
|
Bought a new one to replace my two... Than What !! It is starting o have dye back !! What is happening with that rose!!!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
yesterday by
Jeri Jennings
|
I put an image of Benny Lopez on the Old Town Novato page! (7/14/25)
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
today by
Patricia Routley
|
By mistake or intent? Whatever….. i think it would be clear if you label your photos with the “study name”.
Open the photo, go into Edit, then Photo Comments, and label the rose.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
yesterday by
Unregistered Guest
|
Available from - Becky
becky@hawkhillranch.com
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
28 FEB 20 by
flodur
|
The reference "Rosenjahrbuch, Book (2017) Page(s) 25". is not correct. Baby Château is not mentioned in that book!
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
28 FEB 20 by
jedmar
|
Wrong year, the reference is taken from a Google snippet which states 1968, but could well be an adjacent year.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 3 posted
28 FEB 20 by
flodur
|
Danke, habe ich gefunden. Victor Teschendorff, Dresden, nennt in seinem Rosenkatalog von 1936, Aroma x Hamburg als Eltern.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
yesterday by
HubertG
|
I just came across the entry for 'Baby Chateau' in the Kordes 1936 catalogue when it was introduced and they themselves give the parentage as 'Aroma' x 'Hamburg'.
Their 1935 catalogue also gives a parentage for 'Hamburg' as 'Eva' x 'Daily Mail Scented Rose'.
|
REPLY
|
|
