|
|
Recent Questions, Answers and Comments
-
-
|
The historical Buddha (Siddhartha Gautama) was male, so please don't refer to this rose as a "she". It's incorrect. Not all roses are female!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
It's hard to think that all the photos on this file are of the same rose. Even if photographed with a phone...
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Does this rose set hips?
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
4 NOV 23 by
 petera
|
The rose I have as "Port Arthur" can't be Lady Waterlow if the plant as Mottisfont is correct. I photographed that plant at Mottisfont 18 May 2023; it is stunning and I dearly wish I did have it. If the original found plant was really LW then it must have been switched at some stage in the chain by which it came to me. My plant came from John Nieuwesteeg with budwood, I believe, sourced from the HRIA collection at Ruston's.
|
REPLY
|
|
I see that Lady Waterlow doesn't have any descendants listed, as seed parent. Which doesn't mean it didn't have any, of course.
There are hip photos on the "Pt Arthur" file. I didn't try planting seeds.
|
REPLY
|
|
