|
|
'Mademoiselle Maria' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
21 MAY 21 by
 Michael Garhart
|
"[0004] The new variety of hybrid tea rose plant of the present invention was created by controlled breeding in May 2008 in Sparrishoop, Germany by artificial pollination wherein two parents were crossed which previously had been studied in the hope that they would contribute the desired characteristics. The female parent (i.e., the seed parent) was an unnamed seedling (non-patented). The male parent (i.e., the pollen parent) of the new variety was a seedling from a cross of `Macgenev` (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 8,279) x unnamed seedling' (non-patented in the United States).
[0005] The parentage of the new variety can be summarized as follows:
unnamed seedling.times.('Macgenev' x unnamed seedling)"
-US PP Application #20210092888
They refer to it as a hybrid tea, so it may grow close to a grandiflora in America, or perhaps an application error. Unsure.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
21 MAY 21 by
Patricia Routley
|
Thank you Michael. Details added
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 3 posted
18 APR 22 by
Michael Garhart
|
I am wondering if the codename doesn't mean 'Carmen Wurth' sister, which would be pretty funny.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
19 APR 22 by
jedmar
|
Quite possible: Breeding in May 2008 and parentage fits
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 3 posted
2 days ago by
jac123
|
They do have similar colors, shape, and blooming patterns. Both varieties are cluster flowered - but not in the sense that they have a cluster of flowers at the end of each cane. Rather (at least in the first flush) the last ten or so buds of each cane lead to a single flower with its own long stem. It could be quite interesting for anyone breeding for home cut flower varieties, as you get a good number of individual blooms with sufficient stem length for a home composition. Not that interesting for commercial production, however
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
6 JAN by
Ericchn
|
“Rome, certificate of merit” - I didn’t find the record in the official document: www.worldrose.org/trials/2019-winners-11/2765/
Is this an error?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
7 JAN by
jedmar
|
That does not seem to be the full document, it only lists the Gold awards.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
14 SEP by
Ericchn
|
It’s an absolutely amazing “modern” rose in the sense that it quickly grows into a rounded, even bush with rather matted leaves, and the peduncles are rather short so that the flowers look like floating on the foliage - All of these traits create an “old rose” look just like the Portland roses. I have it planted side by side with Madame Boll and Mrs. John Laing and Fräulein Maria actually looks more “old rose” than the other two.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
25 JUL by
all the names are taken
|
Concerns about heat tolerance.
User Ericchn has provided some breathtaking pictues of Raspberry Cupcake looking absolutely great in "the heat wave of 34°C in Madrid". However, different youtubers and forumers share experiences of Raspberry Cupcake being burned and fried in the Sun with the roses growing right next to them unaffected.
More people should weigh in on this issue.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
25 JUL by
HubertG
|
I've had no experience with it apart from considering buying it because it looks quite appealing, but all I'd say is that I wouldn't consider 34°C particularly hot, and that no doubt ambient humidity must play a part in a rose's performance in any heat.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 2 posted
14 SEP by
Ericchn
|
Please take into account that this variety won at Madrid rose trials in 2019, which means the testing plants were planted in autumn 2017 with a constant dripping system. By the time I took these photos in May 2022, these plants were already well established in the ground with constant and enough water supply, whereas I don’t think it’s the case in US as “Raspberry Cupcake” was only released in 2023.
|
REPLY
|
|
