|
|
'R368-3' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
|
Beginning to wonder if the patent has a clerical error instead of Pretty Lady Rose, as I have seen that elsewhere.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
4 OCT by
 jedmar
|
What is the error, do you think?
|
REPLY
|
|
I think it is supposed to be x Pretty Lady Rose (Weeks), and is instead Pretty Lady (Scrivens). Both used by Weeks. I think its a clerical issue, but its hard to rectify once its in a patent. Oh well.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
5 OCT by
jedmar
|
Is the correct parentage published somewhere else?
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Available from - Edmunds Roses
www.edmundsroses.com
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
I am guessing an improvement on Falling in Love. Hopefully without the Vlad the Impaler stems.
That trait came from Marilyn Monroe, and I can only guess it was a trait that skipped Sunset Celebration from its unknown male parent. I am guessing it is a parent found in a lot of 1990s Fryer HTsn, because I can name a few from that time frame with the exact bizarre canes that can only be described as weapons. In fact, there are photos here on HMF of the canes on 'Bride'.
|
REPLY
|
|
