|
|
jedmar 
-
-
Initial post
1 JUL by
JJS
|
How does a single rose x single rose become a fully double rose??
Perhaps the single rose at Sangerhausen is the real one.
I suggest this R. rugosa 'Acicularis' entry is removed.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
14 days ago by
jedmar
|
The entry is supported by several references and will not be removed. What you are suggesting is that the double rose from L'haÿ is incorrect. For this you you can make a photo error ciomment on the photos.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Rose Listing Omission
You're My Everything
This isn't a missing plant but for some reason my comment will not post on the appropriate page for this rose, which is under WEKsecunk
Rose of the Year 2025 UK, sold as 'You're My Everything'
https://jonestherose.co.uk/roses/youre-my-everything-weksecunk
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
30 JUN by
jedmar
|
Synonym and award added, thank you!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
The parentage is winding over on itself.
|
REPLY
|
|
Can you be more specific please ?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 3 posted
24 JUN by
jedmar
|
The parentages stated cannot be correct: Kate Chillingworth = Lady Adrianna x seedling of Rotilia, whereby Lady Adrianna = Kate Chillingworth x Rosita. Results in a vicious circle.
Member Cambridgelad must have misunderstood Colin Dickson. We will check with Mr. Dickson.
Edit: Parentage for Lady Adrianna corrected
|
REPLY
|
|
Yeah. Now it makes sense.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Peony Listing Omission
Marzipan
https://www.facebook.com/share/EpNaztGnvVtpcXJY/
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
24 JUN by
jedmar
|
Check the rose listing please
|
REPLY
|
|
