|
|
'Sharon's Delight™' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
|
This rose has been reclassified as a mini-flora now by the ARS.
|
REPLY
|
|
Kathy, I cannot find this rose at all in the Modern Roses database, either under Sharon's Delight or MORsharon?
|
REPLY
|
|
Should be there under both. If it's not, I'll enquire. But FYI, ARS is coming out with a newly revamped database in early July.
|
REPLY
|
|
I could not see it. Can you?
|
REPLY
|
|
This rose should be a floribunda. Too big of a flower for MF.
|
REPLY
|
|
Disagree. I showed it yesterday at the San Diego county fair as a miniflora single and it won its class. It is the same size as several other miniflora singles -- Poppy, Sunglow, Maroon 8, Tom Mayhew. It would be much too small to compete in the floribunda single classes like Playboy and Playgirl. The plant itself is also quite small for me -- good for a pot which is how I have it.
|
REPLY
|
|
Mine is the size of Paul Eckes, Jr
|
REPLY
|
|
Paul Ecke Jr. is not a florabunda -- it is officially classed as a "shrub." Moreover, here it has smaller miniflora-like size flowers, but generally in large, fairly widely spaced clusters, on a big plant. Shannon's Delight generally forms its blooms singly, and on a small plant. The possible variations on plant size and bloom type in roses are endless, and any classification system is bound to have outliers. C'est la vie.
|
REPLY
|
|
