|
|
'Bloomfield Abundance' rose Photos
List customization using the above LIST OPTIONS feature is an advanced feature available to premium-membership members and sponsor listings.
|
According to Peter Beales, Roger Phillips, and Martyn Rix, this is the true Bloomfield Abundance, and those guys are the gurus, in my opinion. Whether or not it is a sport of Cecil Brunner is not the question (it may be). But these guys all list the small-budded, long-sepeled plant as the Bloomfield. And I have grown them both side by side, and I do see many differences. Cecile Brunner is rounded, early blooming, and stockier. The Bloomfield Abundance is spindlier, late blooming, and has those long sepals. Over here in CA, there is also quite a bit of controversy regarding this rose. People swear by the found, large pink rose now attributed to Bloomfield Abundance. But I will stick with the Beales, Phillips, etc, school as I have been observing them for years and see a difference and where that large pink rose came from is a mystery.
Uploaded yesterday |
2018, Santa Maria, CA
Uploaded 28 JUN 24 |
|
C,I
Peter Beales and many others conclude that Cecile Brunner and Bloomfield Abuindance are NOT the same rose. We have both and my Bloomfield Abundance has been growing here for over 70 years old. Bloomfield has the long sepels. These are missing from Cecil Brunner. Bloomfoeld Abundance blooms about a month later than Cecil Brunner. There are many other differences and most experts agree the two roses are different AND that the large pink rose mentioned by some is not Bloomfield Abundance. We hope this will be changed in your database.
Uploaded 21 AUG 24 |
2018, Santa Maria, CA
Uploaded 28 JUN 24 |
|
2018, Santa Maria, CA
Uploaded 28 JUN 24 |
2018, Santa Maria, CA
Uploaded 28 JUN 24 |
|
2018, Santa Maria, CA
Uploaded 28 JUN 24 |
2018, Santa Maria, CA
Uploaded 28 JUN 24 |
| C - Member Comments | I - Accuracy Questioned | R - Member Ratings | V - Member Favorite |
|
