I noticed that the parentage is rather vague for my rose Cancan™. So here is the details:


mother = 97-25.12 = (93-288.5 x 91-90.1)

93-288.5 = (88-33.3 x an unknown gold grandiflora)
88-33.3 = (84-179.4 x 85-39.1)
84-179.4 = (80-69.1 x Gold Badge)
85-39.1 = (79-71.5 x 80-11.7)
80-69.1 = (76-19.2 x Playboy)
76-19.2 = (Tampico x Applejack)
79-71.5 = (Dornroschen x 78-3A)
80-11.7 =  (76-45.1 x 78-3A)
78-3A = (Faberge (F) x Eddie's Crimson)
76-45.1 = (Golden Jubilee x Applejack)
91-90.1 = (Knock Out x 80-38.1)
80-38.1 = 76-4C op  (op=open pollinated)
76-4C = (R. rugosa 'Alba' x Applejack
Father: 99-238.1 = (97-33.15 x 95-898A.7)
97-33.15 = (95-1016.17 x 91-90.1)
95-1016.17 = (Morning Magic op)
91-90.1 = (Knock Out x 80-38.1)
80-38.1 = 76-4C op
95-898A.7 = (93-104.3 x Heritage)
93-104.3 = (85-139.1 x 84-196.8) this is a pink sister seedling of Double Knock Out that was blackspot susceptible but very fertile.

Let me know if you have any questions.

As to Cancan's parentage, Plant Patent 21,430 reads, "The new variety of Rosa hybrida shrub rose plant of the present invention was created at Greenfield, Wis., U.S.A., by artificial pollination wherein two parents were crossed which previously had been studied in the hope that they would contribute the desired characteristics. The cross was carried out during July 2001. The female parent (i.e., the seed parent) was the `Radcovery` variety (non-patented in the United States). The male parent (i.e., the pollen parent) of the new variety was the `Radcotee` variety (non-patented in the United States). The parentage of the new variety can be summarized as follows: `Radcovery`.times.`Radcotee`. "