'Baby Vougeot' rose Reviews & Comments
most recent 14 JUL
Initial post
28 FEB 20 by
flodur
The reference "Rosenjahrbuch, Book (2017) Page(s) 25". is not correct. Baby Château is not mentioned in that book!
REPLY
Reply
#1 posted
28 FEB 20 by
jedmar
Wrong year, the reference is taken from a Google snippet which states 1968, but could well be an adjacent year.
REPLY
Reply
#2 posted
28 FEB 20 by
flodur
Danke, habe ich gefunden. Victor Teschendorff, Dresden, nennt in seinem Rosenkatalog von 1936, Aroma x Hamburg als Eltern.
REPLY
I just came across the entry for 'Baby Chateau' in the Kordes 1936 catalogue when it was introduced and they themselves give the parentage as 'Aroma' x 'Hamburg'. Their 1935 catalogue also gives a parentage for 'Hamburg' as 'Eva' x 'Daily Mail Scented Rose'.
REPLY
most recent 31 JUL 09
Initial post
30 JUL 09 by
Don H
From this discussion at the Heritage Rose Foundation forum, it seems like Baby Chateau is no longer extant at the Cranford. http://www.heritagerosefoundation.org/discus/messages/2/2747.html?1166147491
REPLY
I inquired about this a few years ago. Yes, it's a real shame.
REPLY