|
|
'Carmoisine' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
|
Looks like a typo for 'Carmosine'.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 8 posted
11 OCT 10 by
 Cass
|
Modern Roses lists the name as Carmosine by L. Laperrière, but there is confusion.
Roseto Botanico Carla Fineschi lists a 1982 HT named Carmoisine by L. Laperrière. There may be two roses: Carmoisine by L. Laperrière (1982) and Carmosine by R. Laperrière (1995). We have very little information.
|
REPLY
|
|
Hopefully the Viraraghavans can enlighten us. I'll post this thread to their attention.
|
REPLY
|
|
Here is Girija's response.
"Its the Laperierre rose bred in 1982, a Hybrid Tea, codename Lepmiravi. It has been spelt differently in different catalogs etc."
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 8 posted
12 OCT 10 by
Cass
|
I don't know exactly what this means or if anything needs to be done in response.
|
REPLY
|
|
It is confusing.
I interpret it to mean that LAPmiravi, aka 'Carmoisine', bred by Louis Laperrière (France, 1982) is the correct cultivar to use in Viraraghavan lineages, synonymous with 'Carmousine'.
'Carmosine' aka LAPnev by Robert Laperrière 1995 is apparently different rose.
|
REPLY
|
|
Cass.........
I merged the "mispelled" rose that I had added to the HMF database to complete the parentage of 'Remembering Cochet' with the 1982 Laperierre rose so that rose page will come up when the parentage is checked on RC. The 1982 rose has the correct breeder code of the rose identified by Girija and now, the parentage on the rose page matches the parentage published in the registration by the ARS. 'Carmousine' is now listed as a synonym of the rose by Laperierre.
Lyn
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#8 of 8 posted
21 FEB 21 by
flodur
|
The correct name of the rose bred 1982 is Carmosine (Lapmiravi) - see the catalogues of Laperrière from 1982 to 1989 (No longer listed in the catalogues from 1990 until today)
|
REPLY
|
|
