|
|
'I. N. Kicunov' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
14 OCT 08
|
* This post deleted by user *
|
|
Reply
#1 of 4 posted
15 OCT 08 by
 jedmar
|
Thank you for the reference. However, how is it possible to class this rose as a hybrid alba with this parentage?
|
REPLY
|
|
Yes, and the correct name of rose is ´N. J. Kičunov´(Nikolaj Josifovič Kičunov).
And correct citation from the book:
Z. K. Klimenko, E. L. Rubcova: Rozy (Roses), Kijev, Naukovaja dumka, 1986 :
N. I. Kičunov (I. V. Mičurin, 1895, HAlba).
Parentage: Rosa damascena trigintipetala x Rosa foetida persiana. Flowers light pink, full, scented. Leaflets oblong.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 4 posted
16 OCT 08 by
jedmar
|
I understand. But there is no Alba-Component in the parentage.
|
REPLY
|
|
Sorry, I inadvertentently read your question!
It´s supposes that HGall-s, Rosa x alba, R. x damascena was derived from R. gallica, than maybe will be better to include ´N. J. Kičunov´ in HGall or Damask group. It´s on discussion.
|
REPLY
|
|
Sorry, I inadvertentently read your question!
It´s supposes that HGall, R. x alba and R. x damascena was derived from R. gallica. So maybe it will be better ´N. J. Kičunov´ include in HGall or Damask group. It´s on discussion.
|
REPLY
|
|
