We have two different breeder codes Noa20054 and 20059 in the European vs. Australian/NZ applications. Assuming it is not error, then Noack might be commercializing different variants depending on climate.
I wouldn't be surprised if it's some sort of handwriting/reading issue on the journey to Australia. I mean a smudged handwritten 4 could look like a 9. Or just another error, like the patent image of showpiece blush/lipstick. I still feel like Noa16079 and Noa16071 are likely the same...which is another case of just the last digit being different (that and a lot of image overlap used in europe and then aus/nz/usa...tesselaar handle the later, not the former, unless the eu contact gave them the wrong images). Something just seems a bit fishy later with info from noack to tesselaar (or somewhere in between) in the latest round of imports.
