'Hidalgo®' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
|
The lineage section states that the great grand parent of this rose bred in 1979 is Lady from 1983.
|
REPLY
|
|
Yes. That is a curly one. No time to fix it this morning. Basically not Lady, or even Lady X, or even lady X’s code, but Pharaoh 1967 (which had been written as [Pharaoh’s code x Pharaoh] - or something like that. Will fix tomorrow. Thanks ThomasR.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 3 posted
13 JUL 20 by
ThomasR
|
Lady 1983 was certainly incorrect.
There are no descendants listed for (MEIfigu x Pharaon). MEIfigu was ‘Lady X’.
I would say the original 1980 reference was correct wherein it quoted (Meifiga x Pharaon) which is (Pharaon x Pharaon). Meilland bred a lot with that parentage in the 1970s and 1980s. Consequently I have changed the seed grandparent from
[ Lady × Pharaon] to
[Pharaon x Pharaon]
|
REPLY
|
| 
