|
'WEKvossutono' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
When I click on Patent information I get this error.
message "Too many requests"
|
REPLY
|
This happens when internet bots scan HelpMeFind and overwhelm it. It usually only lasts a few minutes.
This is a tough one to solve as many bots do not respect standard website indexing/scanning rules and follow EVERY link on HMF. We continue to work on a solution.
|
REPLY
|
Thank you for the update.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 4 posted
15 NOV by
jedmar
It is also the USPTO that has created hurdles. Go directly on your browser to "Patent Public Search". Click "Basic Search". Type the number as PP18473.
If you get a message like try later, just open simultaneously a second browser window with Patent Public Search. That usually works.
|
REPLY
|
Thank You!. I have for several years tried to figure out how to do a patent search on that site.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
10 SEP by
Nace
I bought this rose as it was suggested to be very disease resistant, but that was not the case in my no-spray garden in zone 7b, NJ USA. It has terrible blackspot resistance in my yard, and I just dug it up. It was very vigorous, bloomed frequently, had no trouble in the prolonged heat wave we had this summer. The blooms also smelled nice, and there was a good number of them at a time, but they faded and shattered within 1-2 days.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
This rose had very poor black spot resistance without spray in my garden near Washington, DC. To its credit, it seemed content to photosynthesize with green stems alone, and persisted for several years that way until I couldn't stand to look at it anymore.
|
REPLY
|
Same experience in Atlanta. It will be shovel pruned soon. Why the fuss over it, I have no idea.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
I've had it for a few years as a much touted perfect rose (disease-resistant, prolific). None of that was true for me. Very disappointing. Loses leaves to BS, little bloom, shatters very fast. I want to replace it with South Africa,. If anyone else knows better, I would appreciate any recommendations.
|
REPLY
|
|