|
|
'Louis Tarboreich' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
|
A New Zealand newspaper description pushes this rose back to at least 1914, and includes a colour description.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 5 posted
30 NOV 20 by
 jedmar
|
Thank you, description added. The name is probably correct 'Louis Tarbouriech'. The name is found in southern France.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 5 posted
2 DEC 20 by
jedmar
|
All mentions of this rose seem to be from Alister Clark. has anyone seen it in a nursery catalogue? Could it be after all one of Clark's own?
|
REPLY
|
|
I searched for it this morning but can’t guarantee my computer’s search facility lately.
I doubt it will have been an Alister Clark rose. He usually named after women, rather than men.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 5 posted
2 DEC 20 by
HubertG
|
I also doubt that it's a Clark rose. There's nothing really under the spelling of Tarbouriech either. I thought, because of the surname distribution in France, that it might have originated with the rose breeders at Montpellier but I can't recall who they were. Perhaps it was someone's sport that they introduced and it was never really took off in Europe but survived Down Under.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 5 posted
2 DEC 20 by
jedmar
|
There is no mention of either Tarbouriech or Tarboreich in "Journal des Roses" until 1914, which is curious. In Geneanet I found mentions of various Louis Tabouriech in the period 1872-1923. The only ones who could have had some connection was a wine grower in Algeria (Mostaganem 1888-98), another one near Beziers, whose Cave still today makes Syrah wine, and a nursery owner in Chalons-sur-Marne in 1901. Tarboreich is definitely out, not a single published mention of that name.
|
REPLY
|
|
