HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
Member
Profile
PhotosFavoritesCommentsJournalCuttings 
joekoel
most recent 26 AUG 22 SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 12 MAR 19 by Margaret Furness
I wonder if the Grafin or her family gave permission for "her" rose to be re-named for a horse. Or if they were asked.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 10 posted 12 MAR 19 by HubertG
Lol, I don't how rights for renaming roses for other countries work, but I do prefer the name 'Black Caviar' to the original German one.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 10 posted 12 MAR 19 by Margaret Furness
I looked up the Grafin on g**gle - think she deserved a rose more than the horse did. Unless you won lots of money on it!
REPLY
Reply #3 of 10 posted 12 MAR 19 by HubertG
True, she did. However, Black Caviar is still easier to say.
REPLY
Reply #10 of 10 posted 26 AUG 22 by Give me caffeine
I'm sure the original German name flows quite nicely if you are German, but I'm equally sure her family didn't use her full title every time they referred to her. Just call it "Astrid" for short. ;)
REPLY
Reply #5 of 10 posted 6 JUN 21 by joekoel
what is the actual variety name ie the German one
REPLY
Reply #7 of 10 posted 6 JUN 21 by Margaret Furness
Astrid Gräfin von Hardenberg.
Or, Nuit de Chine.
REPLY
Reply #8 of 10 posted 6 JUN 21 by joekoel
Thanks Margaret but I think the 2 names you gave are only trademarks. I did find the actual name which is TAN97150. The actual variety names are now called ''codes'' .Variety names are now a joke . Roses become known by their trademarks which in reality makes them invalid Eg Iceberg started as a trademark but became so generically used (ie became the identity) that it is now an alternative variety name
The actual variety name is 'Korbin' but yes who would know it by this name !
REPLY
Reply #9 of 10 posted 24 SEP 21 by MiGreenThumb
Different "trade" names are for individual markets and whatever additional royalties associated with them and rights to use said name. That's why some have multiple (and therefore confusing names). Especially if names are translated for local languages or changed for market suitability. The code registration name is for verification of identity to ensure the proper one is sold. There's nothing actually "illegitimate" about any of the names used for sale.
REPLY
Reply #6 of 10 posted 6 JUN 21 by joekoel
Hi Hubert They simply use a trademark to identify the rose ( this is invalid use ie generic use of a trademark) which is wrong but they get away with it
There are cases though where the trademark through natural attrition rightfully becomes an alternative variety name ( ie synonym)
How many of you out there realise that Iceberg began as a trademark but is now far better known as the variety name than 'Korbin' ie it was so heavily misused it became an invalid trademark
REPLY
Reply #4 of 10 posted 26 JAN 21 by ....
..
REPLY
most recent 27 APR 21 SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 23 DEC 17 by Curdle
Probably far too soon to make any sort of statement at all about this rose, but as it seems to be being sold in every Bunnings store this year, and I have one, here it goes. Bought as a potted bareroot from local Bunnings store in June/July this year (Aus winter 2017), so its not old enough to say anything much about yet. I dont use fungicides or sprays at all, so its survival of the fittest here. Has been a bit of blackspot on old post spring leaves, so its looking a bit naked legged right now, but new growth is continuing, and it has remained completely mildew free. Flowers are pleasantly scented, but not overwhelmingly fragrant ; no balling, and they dont seem to be affected by the weird hot/cold weather sudden spurts of rain that make up a Melbourne spring. Seems to be a slow but steady, twiggy/shrubby sort of grower. Bloom colour is more mid pink with blue undertones than dark pink.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 6 posted 24 DEC 17 by Margaret Furness
Does the label have a breeder code on it? If it was bred by Rankins, it would start with RAN.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 6 posted 24 DEC 17 by Patricia Routley
Rankin’s Roses are part of a group of nurseries who call themselves collectively, Rose Introducers of Australia. They almost never disclose the codes, although Treloars are very good with the codes. Rankins and Landsdale are difficult with codes.
Knight's Roses
Swane's Nurseries
David Austin Roses
Corporate Roses
Roses & Friends
Treloar Roses
Rankin's Roses
Landsdale Rose Gardens
REPLY
Reply #5 of 6 posted 27 APR 21 by joekoel
Hi Patricia I have come up with this info from PALATINE ROSES in Canada
Rose Name Mother and Child I can only presume that this is a variety name because Trademarks CANNOT be variety names ie name of the rose (as above)
Other names JAL25-3-12, JALaroma
Breeder Jalbert 2015
Rose names in Australia are mainly badly used ie genericised trademarks...its all quite farcical
Your list of nurseries is lets say Interesting
REPLY
Reply #6 of 6 posted 27 APR 21 by Patricia Routley
Thank you joekoel. I have merged ‘Mother and Child’ with ‘Mothers and Children’ JALaroma. Appreciate your detective work.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 6 posted 31 DEC 17 by Curdle
I seem to have lost the original tag (rather annoying, I usually keep them). But it didnt have a breeder code; thats always the first thing I check before buying a new release rose, so I can look it up here!. As the advertising really emphasised the disease resistance, thought I would give it a try, even if I couldnt get any other info.
Should be going to Bunnings in the next few days so I'll try to get a pic of a tag for the record.
REPLY
Reply #4 of 6 posted 31 DEC 17 by Patricia Routley
Thank you Curdle. That would be excellent.
REPLY
most recent 26 APR 21 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 26 APR 21 by joekoel
how can this be recognised as Mother and Child when Rankins claim this as a trademark . Trademarks are not variety name
REPLY
most recent 2 DEC 19 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 2 DEC 19 by joekoel
I see that the so called ''Registration Name'' for a particular rose is MEIviolin .I presume that this is the variety name
The ''Exhibition Name'' is Pierre de Ronsard R ...so when the rose is exhibited it is known by its trademark
Is this because people dont know it by its variety name? Im trying to understand how it all works
REPLY
Reply #1 of 1 posted 2 DEC 19 by jedmar
You can find more Information about registered code names and trde names in the following article:

https://www.finegardening.com/article/what-do-those-code-names-on-roses-mean-and-are-they-useful

"Exhibition Name" is a construct applied in USA by the American Rose Society. It Shows which trade Name you have to use if you Show this particular rose in one of the rose exhibitions in America. The Exhibition Name is not relevant in Europe for example. Trade names are for Marketing purposes and can be different for the same rose from country to country.
REPLY
© 2024 HelpMeFind.com