HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
DescriptionPhotosLineageAwardsReferencesMember RatingsMember CommentsMember JournalsCuttingsGardensBuy From 
"Shalice" rose Reviews & Comments
Discussion id : 160-119
most recent 26 JAN HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 26 JAN by petera
I take back my earlier comment about lack of scent. On this warm, humid, summer's day it has a distinct tea rose scent. In the past I couldn't detect any scent but either my nose has changed or the weather has stimulated the flower. Given the foliage and the slight tinge of yellow at the petal bases I think this rose has some tea in its ancestry.

It also appears to be setting hips. I will let them mature before I check for seed.
REPLY
Discussion id : 96-451
most recent 2 FEB 23 SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 20 DEC 16 by Margaret Furness
Collected by John Nieuwesteeg and named for the family who grew it.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 5 posted 20 DEC 16 by Patricia Routley
Thank you Margaret.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 5 posted 4 NOV 18 by HubertG
How regularly does this repeat? It does look more HT than anything else. It actually reminds me a bit of the early illustrations of 'Lady Mary Fitzwilliam'.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 5 posted 5 NOV 18 by Margaret Furness
The expert nurseryman who collected it says it's Portland. I can't answer re repeat but will keep watching it.
REPLY
Reply #4 of 5 posted 21 JAN 23 by Pacifier
I'm of the opinion it's likely the 1867 Baroness Rothschild (Pernet).
It keys out well with the references. George Arends is famously thornless so def not that. Lady Mary Fitzwilliam is very much in the classic HT style (unless you have Mrs Wakefield Christie Miller which was widely sold as Lady Mary).
REPLY
Reply #5 of 5 posted 2 FEB 23 by petera
I don't currently have Baroness Rothschild to compare it with but my memory is that BR has conventional Damask style leaves, is much pricklier, and doesn't have the knobby, jointed stems. The short pedicels, flower form and total lack of fragrance are similar although S is a messier flower. From looking at the pictures on HMF the receptacle is constricted below the sepals in BR but not in S. There is a good picture of BR on HMF posted by Feva back in June 2012 to compare with my Shalice pictures.

The leaves of Shalice are very distinct; it is smooth, thin and papery, and in the spring the new foliage has a strong, silvery, metallic sheen that is not evident later in the season.

It doesn't at all resemble the plant I used have as Georg Arends. That was much like its supposed parent La France with thin stems and higher-centred flowers with a powerful perfume.
REPLY
Discussion id : 126-068
most recent 2 MAR 21 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 1 MAR 21 by Margaret Furness
Would someone who grows Georg Arends please compare it with the photos of "Shalice" - it has been suggested as an ID.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 1 posted 2 MAR 21 by Patricia Routley
I have never relied on perfume as an identifying characteristic, because different noses smell different fragrances. However, in this case, PeterA has said he cannot detect any fragrance in “Shalice”. (PeterA might be a bit like me. The perfume might be there but my nose just cannot smell it.)
Other people need to smell “Shalice” and report back.
‘Georg Arends’ was said to have an excellent centifolia scent.
REPLY
Discussion id : 114-102
most recent 11 SEP 20 SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 18 NOV 18 by Margaret Furness
There is ongoing discussion about whether this is more recent than a Portland.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 6 posted 18 APR 20 by petera
Any further ideas on the class of this rose? To me it screams HP with the exception of its foliage that is very smooth, thin and papery, and too shiny for most HPs. The new foliage in the spring has a strong, silvery, metallic sheen that is not as evident later in the year. It is an odd rose but is healthy, repeats well for an HP and has very lovely large flowers and few prickles. Unfortunately, while it looks like it should be perfumed there is none that my nose detects.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 6 posted 18 APR 20 by Patricia Routley
Smooth, thin and papery. Excellent description Petera. I have added a few more details to the Notes - please check.
Now for hip photo's?
REPLY
Reply #3 of 6 posted 18 APR 20 by Patricia Routley
Margaret, how does “Shalice” compare with Marjorie’s ‘Captain Christy’?
REPLY
Reply #4 of 6 posted 19 APR 20 by Margaret Furness
I don't have Captain Christy here. There is a photo of the plant at Renmark (provenance: Marjorie) under Cl. Captain Christy. It is in a bed that probably didn't get watered this summer.
Captain Christy has one offspring listed from it as seed parent.

My "Shalice" has lots of mummified nothings. I will keep watching the flowers from the recent flush but I don't think it sets viable hips. Mine is planted between two HPs.
REPLY
Reply #5 of 6 posted 19 APR 20 by Patricia Routley
You have photographed ‘Captain Christy’ at Marjorie’s place. I know you cannot go and check her plant these days, but perhaps one day in the future.
REPLY
Reply #6 of 6 posted 11 SEP 20 by Margaret Furness
Ozoldroser and I compared the prickles and foliage of "Shalice" and Captain Christy in winter (didn't have a camera with me till too late), and they are not the same rose.
REPLY
© 2024 HelpMeFind.com