|
raingreen
-
-
Patent info incorrect--the plant with PP2998 has White Masterpiece as a grandparent: "Seed parent.-An unnamed pink-flowered seedling of Revelery X White Masterpiece." See google patents.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
5 FEB by
jedmar
White Masterpiece cannot have itself as grandparent. See comment of 10 July 2005, which says seedling of Revelry X Pink Masterpece as seed parent. Do you have a link to the full patent text?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 3 posted
6 FEB by
jedmar
seed parent Revelry X Pink Masterpiece is correct. The second mention of Revelry X White Masterpiece in the patent is definitely a clumsy error.
|
REPLY
|
Hunh. Thank you for looking into it Jedmar. Nate
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Yowsers a heat-resistant Gigantea!!!!!
|
REPLY
|
I wouldn't call it heat resistant, but it can be nice when the weather cooperates, as it did here this spring.
I budded this one years ago to fortuniana.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Beautiful capture Give Me!!! Cream mixed with butterscotch.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Why has the listed parentage of this rose been modified from the original? It is an important stud rose BECAUSE "Joanna Hill" was one of its parents. Modern Roses 10 does not give Joanna Hill as a parent to Daisy Hill, but several other sources do; MR10 is not the final authority on all parentage information, there are plenty of inaccuracies in the tome. ~Benaminh
|
REPLY
|
If 'Daisy Hill' was bred circa 1900 then it would have been an impossibility to have 'Joanna Hill' as parent as it was bred in 1928. Nice thought though, I would have been interested in that hybrid!
|
REPLY
|
|