HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
Member
Profile
PhotosFavoritesCommentsJournalMember
Garden
Member
Listings
 
Margaret Furness
most recent 2 days ago HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 5 days ago by Margaret Furness
Lovely garden. May it live long and prosper.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 3 posted 3 days ago by Give me caffeine
Hopefully the family can get it back one day.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 3 posted 2 days ago by Margaret Furness
I missed the info about what had happened to it. Yes, may it be there waiting for the family when they can go back.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 3 posted 2 days ago by jedmar
The garden is in Melitopol, which is under occupation since 2022.
REPLY
most recent 3 days ago HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 3 days ago by Give me caffeine
'Alister Clark' finally snuffed it, and I don't want another one. It's just too nasty to work around. Not sure if the parent 'Marjory Palmer' is equally fangsome.

'Comtesse du Cayla' also snuffed it, and is probably worth replacing at some point.

'Gruss an Teplitz' died some time back, and was a rather nice rose. Should get another one sometime.

'Marie Lambert' is looking like it might snuff it. Definitely worth replacing.

'Mister Lincoln' snuffed it .Also worth replacing. Look into other red stinkbombs too.

'Mutabilis' snuffed it, and 'Old Blush' was conquered by the multiflora rootstock. Probably worth getting replacements at some point.

'Perle d'Or' is also kaput and would be worth replacing. Ditto for its sport 'Ravensworth'. Both of these are really nice roses and are worth having.

''Rose Hedge Cottage Pink ROR'' is kaput too, and offhand I don't remember being particularly impressed by anything about it. If I can't remember I probably don't need it.

'Safrano' and 'Souvenir de St. Anne's' also snuffed it. Both are superb roses and well worth replacing.

'Sœur Emmanuelle' is gone too. It had good scent but (IMO) nothing else in its favour.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 2 posted 3 days ago by Margaret Furness
"Rose Hedge Cottage Pink" has the ability to produce flowers of different colours, ranging from dark pink to almost white, at the same time. They have a satiny sheen. In my previous minimal-prune garden it got huge, about 8m across, and a couple of people say it wants to be a climber. Probably just as well you lost it!
REPLY
Reply #2 of 2 posted 3 days ago by Give me caffeine
Oh hang on, now you just made me think I want it again. :D
REPLY
most recent 4 days ago SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 7 AUG 21 by kittykat416
Newbie gardener here; I have never attempted growing roses. I have a 5-foot pillar style trellis in a small space that I want to buy a climbing rose for (zone 7a, 5-6 hours direct light). The Eden climber seems quite robust and an attractive option; however, it is usually described as being a medium to large climber. Is there any downside to planting a large climbing cultivar and just pruning it regularly to keep the size under control for a smaller space? I know there are small climbers available, but there are more limited options for those sizes.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 2 posted 7 AUG 21 by Margaret Furness
As an essential question: what makes the space small - is it somewhere with passers-by? Ie would you be safer with a thornless rose?
I'd suggest you find a local nursery or garden club (or heritage roses group) and ask what will thrive in your area.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 2 posted 4 days ago by Lenora789
Thank you for share this information..........
REPLY
PhotoDiscussion id : 169-551
most recent 7 days ago SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 14 days ago by MalinH
Not Mme Alfred Carrière
REPLY
Reply #1 of 14 posted 14 days ago by Nastarana
Out of curiosity,, how do you know? What characteristics are you looking at to make your determination?
REPLY
Reply #3 of 14 posted 14 days ago by jedmar
I agree too with MalinH. See the two photos I just posted:
- Mme AC has not very densely packed blooms, with petals which are more elongated
- The buds are ovoid pointed, not rounded
REPLY
Reply #5 of 14 posted 13 days ago by Nastarana
Thank you. I think I am seeing the difference, especially in the buds.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 14 posted 14 days ago by Jay-Jay
I tend to agree on this.
The photo John took earlier is the real-one. You might compare Yourselves Nastarana.
Rose photo courtesy of Johno
Anglesey Abbey Gardens, UK, 23/6/23.
Uploaded 22 JUL 23
www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=21.413376
REPLY
Reply #4 of 14 posted 14 days ago by Margaret Furness
It would be interesting to know whether the rose photographed repeat-flowers, which Johno isn't in a position to tell us.
REPLY
Reply #6 of 14 posted 13 days ago by Robert Neil Rippetoe
Looks like Félicité et Perpétue
REPLY
Reply #7 of 14 posted 13 days ago by Margaret Furness
That was my kneejerk reaction too!
REPLY
Reply #8 of 14 posted 13 days ago by Robert Neil Rippetoe
Great minds Margaret!

The buds look like my 'White Pet', which of course, is a sport of Félicité et Perpétue.
REPLY
Reply #9 of 14 posted 12 days ago by MalinH
I agree!
REPLY
Reply #10 of 14 posted 11 days ago by Johno
I am happy to remove the offending photos. The label was nailed to the post so I would assume the garden was sold an incorrect plant to begin with. I have to admit, I am finding it hard to identify the difference.
REPLY
Reply #11 of 14 posted 11 days ago by Robert Neil Rippetoe
It's easy if you've grown MME. Alfred. She's quite different.
REPLY
Reply #12 of 14 posted 11 days ago by Jay-Jay
Hi Johno
Photo wasn't experienced as offending by me.
Maybe someone mixed up the labels.
And I agree with Robert Neil Rippetoe: Once growing this rose, You'll never confuse another rose for it.
REPLY
Reply #13 of 14 posted 9 days ago by MalinH
There are four more photos that you need to remove. Not Mme Alfred Carriere of none of your pictures.
REPLY
Reply #14 of 14 posted 7 days ago by Johno
Removed three. The system seems not to allow more than three deletes at the one time.
REPLY
© 2025 HelpMeFind.com